The Financial Times reports that publishers are mobilizing against a “Google Zero” future—where AI summaries and agentic features answer queries on Google, and far fewer users click through to the open web. The FT frames this as a structural shift: AI Overviews/AI Mode change user behavior at the top of the funnel, which reallocates rather than simply grows traffic, forcing media groups to retool products and revenue models.
Independent data backs up the concern. Pew Research found users clicked a traditional result 8% of the time when an AI summary appeared versus 15% without it; users also ended sessions more often without clicking. Digiday reported member-data showing material referral drops tied to AI Overviews. DCN published a synthesis arguing AI Overviews siphon attention and erode publisher traffic. Similarweb trends suggest rising “zero-click” behavior across news queries.
Publishers are testing portfolio changes (more distinctive, time-sensitive coverage; less commodity explainers), direct audience growth (email, apps, memberships), and new monetization (subscriptions, events, branded journalism, licensing). The FT highlights this strategic diversification, while broader industry coverage underscores the push to reduce single-platform dependency—especially where AI satisfies the query on-page.
Some are also experimenting with technical and policy levers: tightening bot access, negotiating data/licensing with AI companies, or exploring “pay-per-crawl” approaches (e.g., Cloudflare’s proposals) to align costs with value. Whether these levers scale remains an open question, but they reflect a growing intent to price access to content used in AI systems.
Google says overall outbound traffic is relatively stable and that clicks are becoming higher quality (more engaged) as AI assists discovery. Third-party studies, however, measure where AI summaries actually appear, and there the click propensity drops. Both can be true: at the macro level, clicks can hold steady while, at the micro level, AI-covered intents compress CTR and redistribute who gets the remaining clicks (e.g., forums, video, and original reporting may fare better than commodity explainers).
Related: AI Search and the Click Decline: What You Need to Know
1) Design for citation, not just rank.
Treat pages as answer sources. Put a crisp summary up top; use scannable H2/H3s, FAQs, tables, and steps. This raises the odds of being quoted or attributed inside AI Overviews and other curated modules—even when fewer people click.
2) Shift toward “click-worthy” intents.
Invest in assets that require a visit: tools/calculators, local inventory, product finders, interactive visuals, proprietary datasets, original reporting, and opinion. These are harder to fully satisfy inside an AI summary and remain conversion-capable.
3) Build direct demand and loyalty.
Treat AI surfaces as awareness and move users into owned channels: newsletters, push, apps, community. Add on-site prompts and social how-tos to help readers make you a Preferred Source in Google for your beat.
4) Double-down on distinctiveness (E-E-A-T in practice).
Commodity “what is/definition” content is the most susceptible to AI answers. Lean into experience-backed articles, exclusive angles, interviews, and original data—the material AI is more likely to cite and users are more likely to seek out.
5) Re-instrument measurement for AI surfaces.
Segment AI-sensitive queries and track impressions vs. clicks; monitor brand search lift and assisted conversions alongside CTR. Use short-interval comparisons in Search Console to catch sudden shifts as AI coverage expands.
6) Strengthen vertical visibility.
If you’re in categories like finance or travel, align content with the new AI-driven vertical experiences (e.g., Google Finance’s chat/smart charts, Flights’ “Flight Deals” discovery). Clean schema and clear task flows increase your odds of visibility and link-outs.
7) Explore defensibility and partnerships.
Evaluate access controls (robots and firewall-level controls), licensing opportunities, and value-aligned syndication. Watch the evolving norms around compensation for training and answer generation—and test what protects value without sacrificing discovery.
“Google Zero” isn’t the end of SEO; it’s a redefinition of visibility. AI is absorbing more top-of-funnel intent, compressing clicks for generic informational queries while rewarding distinctive, action-oriented, and relationship-driven strategies. Teams that optimize for citation, ship assets that demand a click, and build direct audience will be best positioned to grow—even as AI changes how, and where, users decide
It takes a village to run a successful business. Several staff members contribute to the articles under this bio. You can read more about them here: full bio here.
Get Our Most 7 Controversial S.I.A. Studies That Will Make Even the Most Advanced SEO Shake Their Head in Disbelief.
Plus we will alert you when we publish new tests to the public.
Obtenga nuestros 7 estudios S.I.A. más controvertidos que harán que incluso el SEO más avanzado sacuda la cabeza con incredulidad.
Además, le avisaremos cuando publiquemos nuevas pruebas al público.
Obtenez nos 7 études S.I.A. les plus controversées qui feront trembler la tête même les SEO les plus avancés d’incrédulité.
De plus, nous vous alerterons lorsque nous publierons de nouveaux tests au public.
Before you can receive free updates, link building strategies or SEO tips you need to confirm your email right now.
(It’s easy)
Just go to your inbox, open the confirmation email from the SIA, and click the link.
And that’s it!
PS: If you don’t see a confirmation email, please check your spam/junk or promotions folders. Sometimes the confirmation message ends up there by mistake.
