SEOIntel Weekly News Round-up (Last Week of February 2025)

As the final week of February wraps up, significant developments in the digital world have come to light. A recent Vox Media survey reveals a notable shift in online behavior among younger demographics, with a substantial majority of Gen Z (61%) and Millennials (53%) opting for AI-powered tools over traditional search engines like Google. Moreover, […]
Edgar Allan Abuan
February 28, 2025

As the final week of February wraps up, significant developments in the digital world have come to light. A recent Vox Media survey reveals a notable shift in online behavior among younger demographics, with a substantial majority of Gen Z (61%) and Millennials (53%) opting for AI-powered tools over traditional search engines like Google. Moreover, the survey found that over half of respondents prefer seeking information from their social networks and communities rather than relying on Google or other conventional search platforms. Meanwhile, Google has updated its informational page to include a key detail about its ad auction system, now conducting separate auctions for each unique ad placement. Additionally, a technical glitch was discovered on the Google Ads platform, affecting the sitelinks creation tool’s auto-fill feature, which Google acknowledged as an isolated issue impacting only a small number of users.

Poll Reveals Nearly Half of Respondents Claim Google’s Search Engine is Losing its Effectiveness

A recent Vox Media survey reveals a shift in online behavior among younger demographics, with a significant majority of Gen Z (61%) and Millennials (53%) opting for AI-powered tools over traditional search engines like Google. Furthermore, the survey found that over half of respondents prefer to seek information from their social networks and communities rather than relying on Google or other conventional search platforms.

Early indicators suggest that Google search may be beginning to decline, as evidenced by Google’s market share falling below 90% for the first time in six years and by reports of search users expressing dissatisfaction with search results. The landscape is evolving quickly, with the emergence of AI-powered answer engines and generative engine optimization, as well as the increasing popularity of social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Pinterest for content discovery. Numerous brands and marketers are still adapting to these changing trends.

Understanding the Power of Google Search Results:

  • 76% said that more than a quarter of Google Search shopping results appear to “be sponsored or promoted.” Only 14% described these sponsored or promoted results as “very helpful.”
  • 42% said Google and search engines are becoming less useful.
  • 55% said they get information from their community more than online search platforms.
  • 52% said they use AI chatbots or alternative platforms (e.g., TikTok) for information instead of Google.
  • 66% said the quality of information is deteriorating, making it difficult to find reliable sources.

Verge presentation highlights key survey results:

  • “Legacy tech (e.g. Google) and social platforms are rapidly losing ground as trust and authenticity fades, with more people flocking to AI chatbots, niche communities, and platforms like TikTok. This signals a massive shift and opens the door for disruptive entrants that can offer more authentic, trusted experiences.”

In December, Vox Media collaborated with Two Cents Insights to administer a survey, gathering input from over 2,000 adults across the United States.

Google Ads Utilizes Separate Bidding Processes for Each Advertising Placement, According to Revised Documentation

Google has revised its informational page explaining the mechanics of its ad auction system, adding a key detail that reveals the company will now conduct separate auctions for each unique ad placement.

Recently added content on this page states the following:

“When someone searches on Google, we run different auctions for each ad location – for example top ads are selected by a different ad auction from ads that show in other ad locations. Your ads will only show once in a single ad location, but across ad locations your ads can show more than once.”

Highlighted Additions Shown in Orange:

Anthony Higman noticed the change and expressed his doubts on LinkedIn. He questioned the feasibility of it working as an auction and raised concerns about multiple auctions running simultaneously without affecting each other.

Navah Hopkins expressed concern, stating that this development will severely degrade the quality of search engine results, ultimately leading to a landscape dominated by large brands with substantial budgets, while smaller entities will be forced to rely on alternative strategies, such as Demand Generation, in order to remain visible.

For comparison purposes, you can view the archived version and the current version side by side.

The alteration in how the Google Ads auction is perceived is intriguing, especially since Google modified the criteria for top ads last year as they blend ads with organic search results. Perhaps there is some logic behind this change, or perhaps not. Additionally, Google has been displaying multiple ads simultaneously, as indicated by the statement, “but across ad locations your ads can show more than once.”

Conversation on the LinkedIn forum.

Statement from Ginny Marvin of Google

“We’ve run different ad auctions for different ad placements for many years. We recognize that this aspect of how the auctions work on Search may not be widely known, so we have updated our documentation to provide more details. This is also now reflected in our documentation on Ad Rank. As we continue to experiment with testing different ad configurations, we wanted to bring more clarity into how the Google Ads auction works.”

Issue With the Prefill Functionality on the Google Ads Sitelinks Creation Page

A technical glitch was discovered on the Google Ads platform, affecting the sitelinks creation tool, where the auto-fill feature was malfunctioning. Google acknowledged the problem, describing it as isolated and impacting only a small number of users.

Chris Brewer recently brought attention to a concerning issue on LinkedIn, where he demonstrated how Google was automatically populating sitelinks with URLs from competing websites. Brewer expressed his surprise, stating that Google’s auto-generated sitelinks were inadvertently promoting rival landing pages within his ads. He warned that this could lead to a significant problem for brands relying on automated sitelinks, as it may unintentionally redirect ad revenue to competitors, and advised users to review their sitelinks immediately.

He posted a screenshot of this:

A week later, Ginny Marvin, Google’s Ads Liaison, replied that the issue had to be related to a problem with the auto-fill feature that offers suggestions for reviews on the Sitelink creation page.

She clarified that the problem did not affect dynamic sitelinks or any other asset functionality that is automatically generated.

Although it was not a common problem, “It seems to have been confined to a small scope and did not affect a large number of people.”

LinkedIn discussion thread.